In her recent article, Tavleen Singh deliberates on a pressing question: “Is Indian democracy dead?” She acknowledges that while democracy might not be deceased, recent events have raised concerns about the health of democratic practices in the country. Singh highlights two significant incidents that have sparked debates about the functioning of democracy under the current government’s tenure.
The sealing of Congress Party’s bank accounts and the subsequent arrest of the Chief Minister of Delhi by the Enforcement Directorate have drawn criticism, with opposition figures like Rahul Gandhi lamenting the perceived erosion of democratic principles. Singh notes the timing of these events, which coincided with the impending Lok Sabha elections, raising suspicions about the motives behind targeting opposition leaders and parties.
Singh reflects on her interactions during her election travels, where she found a prevailing sentiment among the electorate that opposition parties were already enfeebled, with no viable leader capable of challenging Narendra Modi. Interestingly, people often associate Modi personally with the BJP’s leadership, emphasizing his influence and popularity over the party itself. Despite local disappointments with BJP leaders, Modi’s perceived achievements, such as improving India’s global stature and initiatives like welfare programs, resonate positively with voters.
During her travels, Singh observes tangible changes in infrastructure and connectivity, particularly improved internet and cell phone services in rural areas. However, she also notes the persistence of socio-economic stagnation, with many expressing disillusionment over the lack of significant changes in their lives since the last election.
Singh’s observations underscore a complex narrative surrounding Indian democracy. While there are concerns about the fairness of political processes and the treatment of opposition voices, there’s also recognition of Modi’s appeal and the perceived benefits of his leadership. The proliferation of saffron “Ram flags” and increased pilgrimages to Ayodhya hint at the intertwining of religious and political sentiments, shaping the country’s socio-political landscape.
In conclusion, Tavleen Singh’s reflections offer valuable insights into the multifaceted nature of Indian democracy. While challenges persist, including allegations of democratic erosion and concerns over political polarization, there’s also acknowledgment of the government’s achievements and the evolving aspirations of the electorate. As India navigates its democratic journey, the need for robust institutions, inclusive governance, and civic engagement remains paramount to uphold the principles of democracy.
